local · Crhk

Po Pin Chau Booking System Flaw Allows Duplicate Registrations, AFCD Confirms Cancellations

about 1 hour ago2 MIN
Po Pin Chau Booking System Flaw Allows Duplicate Registrations, AFCD Confirms Cancellations

Summary

The Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) has acknowledged a technical flaw in the newly implemented reservation system for the Po Pin Chau section of the High Island Geological Trail. The vulnerability allows the same person's personal information to be registered multiple times across different platforms. The department confirmed it has identified several duplicate booking cases and has arranged for the platform operator Klook to cancel these redundant reservations. The trial reservation scheme, covering weekends and public holidays from September 5 to October 7, will undergo a full review afterward.

Key Points

  • The trial reservation system for Po Pin Chau operates from September 5 to October 7, covering weekends, Mid-Autumn Festival, and National Day Golden Week
  • Daily capacity is set at 2,000 visitors, divided into 500-person slots every two hours from 9am to 5pm
  • The AFCD discovered multiple cases where identical names and ID document numbers were used to book the same time slot
  • Contractor Klook will audit booking records and reserves the right to cancel duplicate reservations using the same identification
  • No modifications are permitted after booking confirmation; visitors cannot change dates, time slots, or personal details
  • Valid booking holders must present identification and verify their reserved time slot at the trail entrance before entry
  • The post-trial review will examine the booking platform's operations, quota arrangements, and potential penalty mechanisms

Why It Matters

This vulnerability undermines the primary goal of the reservation system, which aims to manage visitor flow and prevent overcrowding at one of Hong Kong's most popular geological attractions. The AFCD's commitment to a comprehensive post-trial review and consideration of penalty mechanisms signals a broader effort to enforce better crowd control at sensitive natural sites, with implications for how similar attractions may be managed in the future .
This vulnerability undermines the primary goal of the reservation system, which aims to manage visitor flow and prevent overcrowding at one of Hong Kong's most popular geological attractions. The AFCD's commitment to a comprehensive post-trial review and consideration of penalty mechanisms signals a broader effort to enforce better crowd control at sensitive natural sites, with implications for how similar attractions may be managed in the future .