Danny Hospitalized Third Time; Parents Dispute Custody After Court Protection Order
HK01 · 2 SOURCESabout 1 hour ago2 MIN
Summary
Danny, a three-year-old boy at the center of a high-profile child protection case, was rushed to Eastern Hospital in the early hours of September 25, 2026, marking his third hospitalization since being placed under government care. His parents, Mr. Zeng and Ms. Kwan, who lost custody following a court-ordered three-year protection arrangement, arrived at the hospital around 9:30 am and found their son running a high temperature with coughing and phlegm . They told reporters that Danny had been crying inconsolably before their arrival but calmed down upon seeing his father . Medical staff have administered intravenous fluids to address the child's poor appetite and maintain electrolyte balance . The parents claim the Social Welfare Department and Po Leung Kuk have refused to provide psychological support for Danny, despite their repeated requests, and are now exploring legal options to regain custody .
Key Points
- Danny was diagnosed with fever, coughing, and phlegm at Eastern Hospital on September 25, marking his third hospitalization
- Parents Mr. Zeng and Ms. Kwan arrived at the hospital at approximately 9:30 am after receiving notification about their son's condition
- The court previously issued a three-year protection order placing Danny under Social Welfare Department care
- Parents report Danny has been crying frequently and experiencing sleep disturbances due to separation anxiety
- The family has repeatedly requested psychological support for Danny from Po Leung Kuk and SWD but was refused
Why It Matters
This case highlights ongoing tensions between parental rights and child protection measures in Hong Kong's welfare system. The parents allege that institutions caring for children under three years old violate United Nations guidelines on alternative child care, raising questions about the adequacy of current policies. As Danny's parents prepare to explore legal remedies, the outcome could set a precedent for how Hong Kong balances child welfare with family unity.
This case highlights ongoing tensions between parental rights and child protection measures in Hong Kong's welfare system. The parents allege that institutions caring for children under three years old violate United Nations guidelines on alternative child care, raising questions about the adequacy of current policies. As Danny's parents prepare to explore legal remedies, the outcome could set a precedent for how Hong Kong balances child welfare with family unity.